Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::close() should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::close(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::read($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::read(string $id): string|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::write($session_id, $session_data) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::write(string $id, string $data): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::destroy($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::destroy(string $id): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::gc($maxlifetime) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::gc(int $max_lifetime): int|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
The Frequent, Casual and Lackadaisical Summoning of High Court officials not an Appreciable Step
05 Jun 2021 03:11 pm
6th April 2021 Supreme Court
Justices: Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hemant Gupta
While entertaining the Special Leave Petition filed by the UP Government against the summons orders passed by the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, it has been observed by the High Court that “The frequent, casual and lackadaisical summoning of high officials by the Court cannot be appreciated. We may add this does not mean that in compelling situations the same cannot be done but the object cannot be to humiliate senior officials.” The Bench has observed that “to say the least, we are quiet shocked at the perusal of the order dated 02.03.202. Once the operation of the order has been stayed, the natural consequences would be that the contempt proceedings would be kept in abeyance”.
The Bench has also observed that “once the order of which contempt was alleged was stayed, there would be no cause for calling the officers as there was no question of any non-compliance of the order which has been stayed. This Court has even on various occasions through judicial pronouncements deprecated the practice of unnecessarily calling officers to court. In that context, it has been observed that the true, faith and confidence of the common man in the judiciary cannot be frittered away by unnecessary and unwarranted show or exercise of power”.
