Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::close() should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::close(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::read($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::read(string $id): string|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::write($session_id, $session_data) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::write(string $id, string $data): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::destroy($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::destroy(string $id): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::gc($maxlifetime) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::gc(int $max_lifetime): int|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Neither Union Nor State Has Power To Issue Guidelines To Govern Judicial Discretion Of Courts
21 Aug 2019 11:26 am
Bombay High Court has dismissed a petition filed by a man who challenged the constitutional validity of Section 125 of CrPC and held that neither the Union nor the State has any power to issue guidelines to govern judicial discretion of courts.
Court was responding a prayer in the petition which sought guidelines to be issued by the Centre or State for awarding maintenance under Section 125.
Division bench of Justice Akil Kureshi and Justice SJ Kathawalla were hearing a writ petition filed by Mohd.Hussain Patil challenging the vires of Section 125 of CrPC. Petitioner had alleged that the said provision discriminates between men and women and is thus against Article 14 of the Constitution.
Mohd. Hussain Nizampasha Patil vs Nilofar and Ors.
