Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::close() should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::close(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::read($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::read(string $id): string|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::write($session_id, $session_data) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::write(string $id, string $data): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::destroy($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::destroy(string $id): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::gc($maxlifetime) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::gc(int $max_lifetime): int|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Courts Shall Give Reasons For Rejecting Discharge Plea
07 Dec 2019 02:31 pm
The Karnataka High Court has held "It is incumbent on the courts to state reasons with reference to the material on record on which reliance is placed to formulate an opinion to reject the application for discharge."
Justice G Narendar while allowing a petition filed by one Santosh Kumar, and setting aside order passed by lower court rejecting discharge plea filed by him said "The reading of the said order would reflect non-application of mind by the learned JMFC."
Kumar had approached the high court challenging orders passed by the JMFC and Revisional court in a case registered against him under sections 498 A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC and Section 3, 4, 5 & 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
The JMFC court while rejecting the plea made a general observation that on perusal of the entire material on record, there is a sufficient material of harassment by respondent and in the same breadth it further observed that at this stage participation of accused in the alleged offences can not be decided on the basis of material available on record".
